Projected capacitive touch sensor with asymmetric bridge pattern field

ABSTRACT

A capacitive touch sensitive device includes a matrix of pads patterned in a first electrically conductive material on a substrate. Horizontally adjacent pads within each even row of the matrix are electrically coupled to one another via channels to form a plurality of horizontally arranged electrodes. Insulators are positioned over respective channels. Conductive links are formed over respective insulators and are configured to electrically couple vertically adjacent pads between odd rows of the matrix to form a plurality of vertically arranged electrodes. The dimensions of the channels and the conductive links are configured such that an RC time-constant (RCtc) of each of the vertically arranged electrodes substantially matches an RCtc of each of the horizontally arranged electrodes.

FIELD

The subject matter disclosed herein relates generally to capacitivetouch sensors, and more particularly to a projected capacitive touchsensor with an asymmetric bridge pattern.

BACKGROUND

Projected capacitive touch sensors typically include a substrate uponwhich sensing electrodes are disposed. The substrate may be a durableglass having high optical transparency for viewing images displayed byan underlying display device that displays images such as graphicalbuttons and icons. When a user touches the outer surface of thesubstrate at a location corresponding to a desired selection displayedon the display device, the location is determined by sensing a change inthe capacitance of the sensing electrodes.

In some projected capacitive touch sensors, the sensing electrodes arearranged in rows and columns. The rows and columns comprise pads thatare generally arranged in the form of a matrix. Horizontally adjacentpads in a given row of the matrix are connected together to form asingle horizontally arranged electrode. Although, in some projectedcapacitive touch sensors, the horizontally arranged electrodes may besplit so that they do not span the entire sensor. Likewise, verticallyadjacent pads in a given column are connected together to form a singlevertically arranged electrode, and vertical electrodes like horizontalelectrodes optionally may be split.

Typically commercial projected capacitive touch sensor products areconstructed from a lamination of at least two layers of glass in whichhorizontal electrodes and vertical electrodes are on different glasssurfaces. For example, horizontal electrodes may be on one surface of aglass layer and the vertical electrodes on the opposite surface of thesame glass layer. Alternatively horizontal and vertical electrodes maybe fabricated on different glass layers. In either case, there ismanufacturing cost associated with lamination of more than one piece ofglass and with the fabrication of electrodes on more than one surface.Alternate designs in which both horizontal and vertical electrodes arefabricated on only one glass surface promise reduced manufacturing cost,particularly if the projected capacitive touch sensor includes only oneglass layer with no lamination.

To facilitate both horizontally arranged and vertically arrangedelectrodes on a single surface, bridging connections may be utilized toconnect adjacent pads of a given electrode orientation. For example,bridging connections may couple the vertically adjacent pads that formthe vertically arranged electrodes. Known bridging connections have asubstantially square geometry. That is, the width and height of thebridge connections are the same.

Associated with each electrode is resistance and capacitance, both ofwhich depend on the size of the touch sensor. As the linear dimensions,of the touch sensor increase, so do the resistances and capacitancesassociated with the electrodes. The resulting resistor-capacitor timeconstant (RCtc) representative of electronic settling times of the touchsensor tend to grow quadradically with touch sensor size as bothresistance and capacitance grow linearly. For small projected capacitivetouch sensors used in smart phones or tablet computers, electronicsettling times are less of an issue. However, for touch sensors designedfor 15″ diagonal displays and larger displays, long touch sensorelectronic settling times become more problematic.

One problem with such large projected capacitive touch sensors is thatthe resistor-capacitor time constant (RCtc) of the horizontally andvertically arranged electrodes tends to be high and do not match. Forexample, a typical RCtc for such a large projected capacitive touchsensor may be 9 μs or higher. This is especially problematic when usedin conjunction with fixed drive frequency controllers in which the totalscan time is determined by the maximum RCtc of the arranged electrodes.The higher the RCtc, the more time that is needed to sense a capacitancevalue of the electrode. This in turn impacts the rate at which a touchlocation can be determined, which may negatively impact user experience.

Electronics may read-out projected capacitive touch sensitive devices ineither self-capacitive mode, mutual-capacitive, or a mixed mode, whichis combination of the two. In self-capacitive mode, electronics measureone capacitance per electrode. In mutual capacitance mode, orall-points-addressable (APA) mode, electronics measure capacitancebetween a row electrode and a column electrode. In either case, thecapacitance changes when a finger approaches the electrode. The sameprojected capacitive touch sensor construction may supportself-capacitive mode, mutual-capacitive mode, and mixed mode electronicread out.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect of an embodiment of the invention, a capacitive touchsensitive device includes a matrix of pads patterned in a firstelectrically conductive material on a substrate. Horizontally adjacentpads within each even row of the matrix are electrically coupled to oneanother via channels to form a plurality of horizontally arrangedelectrodes. Insulators are positioned over respective channels.Conductive links are formed over respective insulators and areconfigured to electrically couple vertically adjacent pads between oddrows of the matrix to form a plurality of vertically arrangedelectrodes. The dimensions of the channels and the conductive links areconfigured such that an RCtc of each of the vertically arrangedelectrodes substantially matches an RCtc of each of the horizontallyarranged electrodes. The dimensions of channels and conductive links maynot be constant, but locally vary within the touch area. That is,different channels and links may have varying dimensions.

In a second aspect of an embodiment of the invention, a method ofmanufacturing a capacitive touch sensitive device includes patterning amatrix of pads in a first electrically conductive material on asubstrate. Horizontally adjacent pads within each even row of the matrixare electrically coupled to one another via channels to form a pluralityof horizontally arranged electrodes. The method also includes forminginsulators over respective channels from an insulator and formingconductive links over respective insulators configured to electricallycouple vertically adjacent pads between odd rows of the matrix to form aplurality of vertically arranged electrodes. The dimensions of thechannels and the conductive links are configured such that an RCtc ofeach of the vertically arranged electrodes substantially matches an RCtcof each of the horizontally arranged electrodes. The dimensions ofchannels and conductive links may not be configured as constantdimensions, but may be configured to locally vary within the touch area.That is, different channels and links may be configured with varyingdimensions.

In a third aspect of an embodiment of the invention, a capacitive touchsensitive device includes a matrix of pads patterned in a firstelectrically conductive material on a substrate. Horizontally adjacentpads within each even row of the matrix are electrically coupled to oneanother via channels to form a plurality of horizontally arrangedelectrodes. Insulators are positioned over respective channels.Conductive links are formed over respective insulators and areconfigured to electrically couple vertically adjacent pads between oddrows of the matrix to form a plurality of vertically arrangedelectrodes. The dimensions of the channels and the conductive links areconfigured such that an RCtc of each of the vertically arrangedelectrodes substantially matches an RCtc of each of the horizontallyarranged electrodes. The total number of vertically arranged electrodesmay be different than a total number of horizontally arrangedelectrodes, and the RCtc of each of the vertically arranged electrodesand the horizontally arranged electrodes may be less than 6.5 μs and iswithin ±50% of each other. The dimensions of channels and conductivelinks may not be constant, but locally vary within the touch area. Thatis, different channels and links may have varying dimensions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide a furtherunderstanding of the claims, are incorporated in, and constitute a partof this specification. The detailed description and illustratedembodiments described serve to explain the principles defined by theclaims.

FIG. 1 illustrates a capacitive touch sensitive device;

FIG. 2 illustrates details of a portion of an electrode matrix of thecapacitive touch sensitive device;

FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate different elements of the electrode matrix thatfacilitate coupling of pads of the matrix to form horizontally andvertically arranged electrodes;

FIG. 4A illustrates various dimensions of channels and links that coupleadjacent pads that may be adjusted according to various embodiments;

FIG. 4B illustrates an alternative channel geometry that facilities inthe reduction of resistance along a horizontally arranged electrode;

FIG. 5 illustrates channels and links of varying dimensions according tovarious embodiments;

FIG. 6 illustrates a touch sensitive device with locally varying channeland link geometries according to various embodiments; and

FIG. 7 illustrates a touch sensitive device with varied overlap areaaccording to various embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments will be described more fully hereinafter with reference tothe accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodimentscontemplated herein are shown. Indeed, various embodiments may beimplemented in many different forms and should not be construed aslimited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodimentsare provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legalrequirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.

The embodiments described below overcome the problems discussed above byutilizing connections with asymmetric elements to couple the pads of thehorizontally and vertically arranged electrodes.

FIG. 1 illustrates capacitive touch sensitive device 100. The device 100includes a substrate 105 upon which an electrode matrix 110 is arranged.The electrode matrix 110 includes a group of horizontally arrangedelectrodes and vertically arranged electrodes. In one exemplaryembodiment, to accommodate a 16:9 display aspect ratio, the horizontallyand vertically arranged electrodes fit within a rectangular area of thesubstrate that has a width, W, of about 477 mm and a height, H, of about270 mm. Sixty-four vertically arranged electrodes and thirty-sixhorizontally arranged electrodes may be positioned within that area. Inother words, the ratio of the number of vertically arranged electrodesto horizontally arranged electrodes may be about a 16:9. It isunderstood, however, that the principles disclosed herein may be adaptedto accommodate different display sizes and a different number ofhorizontally and vertically arranged electrodes.

FIG. 2 illustrates details of a portion of the electrode matrix 110. Thematrix 110 is generally composed of a group of pads 205 arranged in rowsand columns. In one exemplary embodiment, each pad 205 has a generallydiamond shape and has an area of about 18 mm². The pads 205 may bepatterned by etching an electrically conductive material layerpreviously deposited on a surface of the substrate 105, such asindium-tin-oxide (ITO). The sheet resistance of the electricallyconductive material layer may be about 150 Ω/sq. However, differentconductive materials may be used, and the pads 205 may be patterneddifferently and/or have a different shape.

In one implementation, horizontally adjacent pads 205 within every otherrow 210 (e.g., even rows) of the matrix 110 are electrically coupled toone another to collectively form horizontally arranged electrodes 210that span substantially the entire width, W, of the capacitive touchsensitive device 100. In other implementations, a given row may includemultiple horizontally arranged electrodes that each group a subset ofthe pads in the row, for example a horizontal row may be split into leftand right electrodes. Pads 205 in the other rows (e.g., odd rows) arecoupled to one another column-wise to collectively form verticallyarranged electrodes 215 that span substantially the entire height, H, ofthe capacitive touch sensitive device 100. The horizontally arrangedelectrodes 210 are utilized to determine the vertical coordinate of atouch. The vertically arranged electrodes 215 are utilized to determinethe horizontal coordinate of the touch.

FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate different elements of the matrix 100 thatfacilitate coupling of the pads 205 to form the horizontally andvertically arranged electrodes (210, 215). Referring to FIG. 3A,channels 305 couple the horizontally adjacent pads 205 of thehorizontally arranged electrode 210. The channels 305 may be formed fromthe same electrically conductive material layer used to form the pads205 and may be patterned at the same time as the pads 205. For example,an electrically conductive material may be uniformly deposited on thesubstrate 105. A mask that defines the pattern of FIG. 3A may be used toselectively remove unwanted conductive material to define the pattern ofFIG. 3A.

Referring to FIG. 3B, insulators 310 may be formed over the channels305, and in FIG. 3C, links 315 made of a conductive material may bedeposited over the insulators 310 to couple vertically adjacent pads 205of the vertically arranged electrodes 215. The insulators 310 may beformed from an insulating material such as a polymer or ceramic. Forexample, glass paste part number NP-7770B1 from Noritake Corp. orceramic part number G3-5679 from Okuno Corp. may be utilized for theinsulating material.

The insulators are sized to prevent a short circuit between the links315 and the channels 305 below, even when there are reasonableregistration tolerances or errors during manufacture. That is, theinsulators 310 may be slightly larger than the portion of the channels305 over which the links 315 are deposited. The links 315 may be formedfrom the same transparent conductive material used to form the pads 205or a different material. In one exemplary embodiment, the links 315 areformed from a conductive material with a sheet resistance of about 200Ω/sq.

FIG. 4A illustrates various dimensions (Cw, Ch, Lw, and Lh) of thechannel 305 and link 315 that may be adjusted according to variousembodiments. Typical channels and links are patterned to overlap andhave a generally square geometry with matching surface area sizes. Thatis, dimension Lw and Ch may match, and dimensions Lh and Cw may match.Applicant has observed that the RCtc associated with the horizontallyand vertically arranged electrodes can be varied somewhat by adjustingthe sizes of the channels and links.

Table 1 summarizes the results of various RCtc simulation resultsassociated with electrode sensor matrices with different channel andlink dimensions. In conventional designs, each of the electrode sensormatrices utilizes a diamond-shape pad with a surface area of about 18mm². Sixty-four pads are arranged within each horizontally arrangedelectrode, and thirty-six pads are arranged within each verticallyarranged electrode. The RCtc associated with the horizontally arrangedelectrode is larger than the RCtc associated with the verticallyarranged electrode due to its increased length and, therefore,represents a worst-case RCtc of the matrix. Only horizontal electrodeRCtc values are shown in Table 1. The RCtc of an electrode may bedetermined from the resistance per pad, R, and number of pads perelectrode, n, and effective capacitance per pad, C, of the electrodewhich, in this case, is the horizontally arranged electrode. Theresistance, R, may be determined by dividing the total electroderesistance by the number of pads in the electrode. The effectivecapacitance, C, corresponds to coupling capacitance between a given padand its neighboring pads and to ground. The resistor-capacitor timeconstant associated with an electrode with n pads is given byRCtc=(nR)·(nC)=n²RC.

As shown, the electrode sensor matrix that utilizes channels and linkswith respective widths and height (Cw, Ch, Lw, and Lh) of about 0.4 mmhas the lowest horizontal RCtc, which was determined to be 8.96 μs.

TABLE 1 Size (Lw × Ch) (mm) 1.0 × 1.0 0.5 × 0.5 0.4 × 0.4 0.3 × 0.3 0.2× 0.2 R (Ω) 540 676 732 810 934 C (pF) 6 3.32 2.99 2.72 2.51 HorizontalRCtc (μs) 13.27 9.19 8.96 9.02 9.6

Table 2 summarizes the results when asymmetric shapes are utilized forthe channels 305 and links 315 instead of square shapes. For asymmetricshapes, it was observed that the worst case RCtc was not alwaysassociated with the longer electrode axis (i.e., horizontally arrangedelectrode). Therefore, the RCtc of both the horizontally and verticallyarranged electrodes were measured for various dimensional combinationsof the channels 305 and links 315. As shown, the lowest overall RCtc isassociated with a channel with a width, Cw, of 0.4 mm and a height, Ch,of 1.0 mm, and a link with a width, Lw, of 0.2 mm and height, Lh, of 1.2mm. The worst-case RCtc is 6.04 μs and is associated with thehorizontally arranged electrode. The RCtc for the horizontally andvertically arranged electrodes are within ±50% of each other, andpreferably ±10%, and more preferably ±2% of each other. That is, theRCtc of the respective sensors essentially match.

TABLE 2 Channel (Cw × Ch) 0.4 × 0.6 1.0 × 1.0 1.0 × 1.1 1.0 × 0.9 0.4 ×0.9 0.4 × 0.8 0.4 × 1.0 0.4 × 1.1 Link (Lw × Lh) (mm) 0.4 × 0.6 0.2 ×1.2 0.2 × 1.3 0.2 × 1.1 0.2 × 1.1 0.2 × 1.0 0.2 × 1.2 0.2 × 1.3Horizontal R (Ω) 732 521 493 553 482 510 459 439 C (pF) 2.99 2.99 3.172.91 3.11 3.03 3.21 3.26 RCtc (μs) 8.96 6.38 6.40 6.59 6.14 6.33 6.045.86 Vertical R (Ω) 732 1515 1583 1447 1447 1379 1515 1583 C (pF) 2.992.87 3.03 2.76 2.95 2.90 3.04 3.06 RCtc (μs) 2.94 5.63 6.21 5.18 5.535.18 5.97 6.28

The sheet resistance of the material used to form the channels 305 andlinks 315 was assumed to be the same for the matrices determined above.For example, the channels 305 and links 315 were assumed to have a sheetresistance of 150 Ω/sq. However, this may not always be practical. Insome exemplary embodiments, the materials used to pattern the channels305 and the links 315 are different. The sheet resistance of thematerial used to pattern the links 315 may, for example, be 200 Ω/sq.

Table 3 summarizes the results when such a material is used for thelinks 315. The channels and links of the matrices were arranged asdescribed earlier. The combination with the lowest overall RCtc isrepresented in the fourth column. In this case, the channel 305 has awidth, Cw, of 0.4 mm and height, Ch, of 1.1 mm. The link 315 has awidth, Lw, of 0.2 mm and height, Lh, of 1.3 mm. The worst-case RCtc is6.28 μs and is associated with the vertically arranged electrode.

TABLE 3 Channel (Cw × Ch) 0.4 × 0.9 0.4 × 0.8 0.4 × 1.0 0.4 × 1.1 Link(Lw × Lh) (mm) 0.2 × 1.1 0.2 × 1.0 0.2 × 1.2 0.2 × 1.3 Horizontal R (Ω)482 510 479 457 C (pF) 3.11 3.03 3.21 3.26 RCtc (μs) 6.14 6.33 6.30 6.10Vertical R (Ω) 1723 1630 1515 1583 C (pF) 2.95 2.90 3.04 3.06 RCtc (μs)6.59 6.13 5.97 6.28

FIG. 4B shows an alternate channel geometry that is possible when thelink width, Lw, is substantially narrower than the channel width, Cw, asis the case with for the channel of FIG. 4A. The modified channelgeometry facilitates the reduction of channel resistance and, therefore,a reduction in the RCtc for the horizontally arranged electrodes, bygradually narrowing the channel height, Ch, of the horizontally arrangedelectrode as approaches the edge of the insulator 310. The dashed lines405 in FIG. 4B represents the geometry of the gap between vertical andhorizontally arranged electrodes in FIG. 4A and are shown to illustratethe difference between the channel geometries of FIGS. 4A and 4B. Thechannel geometry of FIG. 4B reduces the current path length for whichthe channel is most constricted. The channel width Cw for the design ofFIG. 4B is smaller than the channel width Cw of FIG. 4A by an amount of2δ where δ is the length of the horizontal kink in the electrodeboundaries as shown in FIG. 4B. Representative values of δ are in therange from 100 microns to 400 microns with 200 microns being a typicalvalue. The height of the horizontal electrode at the kink of length δ isgreater than the channel height Ch by an amount 2Δ where Δ is thevertical offset of the kink relative to the channel boundaries as shownin FIG. 4B. To receive the full benefit of the shortened channel widthCw, it is desirable that the kink vertical offset Δ is larger than thekink length δ. Representative values of the kink vertical offset Δ arein the range from 300 microns to 1,200 microns with 600 microns being atypical value. Corners in the electrode boundaries can be rounded andsmoothed and the design will still provide substantially the samebenefits. The essential feature of the design of FIG. 4B is a modifiedelectrode boundary geometry in which the channel width Cw is reduced ina way that reduces the horizontal electrode resistance while to a goodengineering approximation retaining a similar area and geometry of thediamond shaped pads that compose the electrodes. This, in turn, reducesthe horizontal electrode resistance and hence RCtc while havingsubstantially no effect on vertical electrode resistance of RCtc.

For projected capacitive touch sensors that are read out inself-capacitance mode, the horizontal electrode read out speed (moreparticularly the excitation drive frequency) is limited by thehorizontal RCtc and the vertical electrode read out speed is limited bythe vertical RCtc. If the same read out speed is used for both verticaland horizontal electrodes in self-capacitance mode, there is a clearadvantage to minimizing the larger or worst-case of the horizontal andvertical RCtc values. For projected capacitive touch screen that areread out in mutual-capacitance mode, the horizontal and vertical RCtcvalues contribute to a mutual-capacitance settling time that limits theread out speed of mutual capacitances. While the mathematical details ofhow horizontal and vertical RCtc values combine for mutual capacitancereadout is complex, it is still of benefit to balance horizontal andvertical RCtc values to provide faster mutual-capacitance readout.

While embodiments described above are for projected capacitive touchsensors with horizontal and vertical electrodes on the same surface ofthe same glass (or polymer) layer, one skilled in the art willunderstand that balancing of horizontal and vertical values of RCtc alsoprovide benefits for touch sensors with horizontal and verticalelectrodes on different glass surfaces.

As described, varying the dimensions of the channels and links allowsfor the reduction in RCtc and matching of the RCtc associated with thehorizontally and vertically arranged electrodes. This in turnfacilitates faster acquisition of a touch location, which ultimatelyresults in a more pleasant user experience.

Advantageously, the dimensions of channels and links may be optimizedlocally as well as globally within an electrode matrix of a touchsensor. Referring to FIG. 1, the channels and links have been optimizedglobally if all the links within electrode matrix 110 of touch sensor100 have the same dimensions and all the channels within electrodematrix 110 have the same dimensions, and the values of the link andchannel dimensions have been chosen to reduce or minimize the RCtc. Incontrast, the channels and links have been optimized locally if withinan electrode matrix of a touch sensor different channels and links havevarying dimensions. By varying channel and link dimensions locally it ispossible to further reduce RCtc.

FIG. 5 illustrates channels and links of varying dimensions. Forsimplicity of presentation, as well as to further illustrate thegenerality of this aspect of the invention, FIG. 5 illustrates channelsof horizontal electrodes on the surface of a lower layer of glassseparated from links between pads of vertical electrodes on an opposingsurface of a separate upper layer of glass that is bonded to the lowerlayer of glass with an insulating and optically clear adhesive layer. Inthis case, beyond an optically clear adhesive, no additional insulators(such as insulators 310 of FIG. 3B) are needed to prevent electricalshorts between channels and links. Dashed lines outline the channelsconnecting pads of horizontal electrodes on the lower glass layer andsolid lines outline the links connecting pads of vertical electrodes onthe upper glass layer. In the plan view of FIG. 5, the shaded rectanglesof squares indicate the area of overlap between the channel and link.Nine different examples of channel and link geometry are illustrated in(a) through (i) of FIG. 5. While FIG. 5 shows lower horizontal channelsand upper vertical links, lower vertical channels and upper horizontallinks is equally possible. As in the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A,3B, and 3C, it is possible to modify the structures of FIG. 5 so thatpads of both horizontal and vertical electrodes are on the samesubstrate surface via addition of an insulator between channels andlinks.

From the left geometries (a), (d), and (g) to the right geometries (c),(f), and (i) of FIG. 5, the channel widens while the link narrows, thatis the ratio R of channel width to link width increases while keepingthe overlap area A fixed. From bottom geometries (g), (h), and (i) totop geometries (a), (b), and (c) the ratio R stays the same while thearea A of overlap increases. For the middle column, from the largeoverlap area of geometry (b), to smaller overlap area of geometry (e),to the smallest overlap area of geometry (h), the stray capacitanceassociated with the overlap decreases as desired to reduce RCtc whileunfortunately increasing the channel and link resistances. For themiddle row, from small channel-width-to-link-width ratio of geometry(d), to equal channel and link widths of geometry (e), to largechannel-width-to-link-width ratio of geometry (f), the channelresistance decreases as is desired to reduce RCtc while unfortunatelythe link resistance increases. An optimal trade-off may vary withposition of the channels and links within the touch sensor. That is tosay that it may be desirable to optimize locally rather than globally toprovide the greatest reduction in RCtc.

As shown in FIG. 5, channels are of uniform width throughout theirlengths and links are also of uniform width throughout their lengths.However, neither the channels nor links need necessarily be perfectlyuniform in their widths along their lengths. More generally, the channelwidth may be defined as the average of the channel width over the lengthof the channel overlapping with the link. Similarly, the link width maybe defined as the average of the link width over the length of the linkoverlapping with the channel. For clarity, channels and links are shownwith uniform widths in the figures. Nevertheless, it is understood thatlinks and channels need not be of uniform widths along their lengths.

FIG. 6 illustrates a touch sensitive device 600 with locally varyingchannel and link geometries. Illustrated are four different signal pathsfrom the drive electronics (schematically represented by the bottom grayrectangle labeled “Drive”) to the sense electronics (schematicallyrepresented by the right gray rectangle labeled “Sense”). There is ageneral tendency for signals that travel greater distances through theRC network of the touchscreen to have longer RC time constants and forsignals that travel shorter distances to be faster. For example, signalsthrough path D tend to be faster, signals through paths B and C to beslower, and signals through the longest paths such as A to be slowest.In engineering practice, it is often desirable to improve the worstcase, even at the expense of other cases. In particular, it improvesoverall system performance and user satisfaction to reduce RCtc forworst case signal path A even at the expense of somewhat increasing RCtcfor other signal paths such as signal paths B and C.

As illustrated in the detail to the left of FIG. 6, touch sensitivedevice 600 uses a small channel-width-to-link-width ratio R (as ingeometry (d) of FIG. 5) in the lower left region of the touch area. Byincreasing link widths and hence reducing link resistances in thevertical electrode of signal path A, RCtc for signal path A is reduced.This is at the expense of reducing channel widths and hence increasingchannel resistances for the horizontal electrode of signal path B; thisis acceptable because signal path B is not the worst case. In contrast,the touch sensitive device 600 uses a large channel-width-to-link-widthratio R (as in geometry (f) of FIG. 5) in the upper right region of thetouch area. By increasing channel widths and hence reducing channelresistances in the horizontal electrode of signal path A, RCtc forsignal path A is reduced. This is at the expense of reducing link widthsand hence increasing link resistances for the vertical electrode ofsignal path C; again this may be acceptable because signal path C is notthe worst case. Along the upper left to lower right diagonal, thechannel-width-to-link-width ratio R is similar to that used to globallyoptimize channel and link dimensions for minimum RCtc.

In the touch sensitive device 700 of FIG. 7, it is not thechannel-width-to-link-width ratio R that is varied locally, but ratherthe overlap area A. Touch sensitive device 700 is provided with driveand sense electronics similar to touch sensitive device 600 and issimilarly represented in FIGS. 6 and 7. To reduce stray capacitancesalong the worst case signal path A, and hence reduce its RCtc, theoverlap area A is reduced in the upper left portion of the touch area.Unfortunately, the reduced overlap area A results in increasedresistance along the vertical and horizontal electrodes of signal pathA. While not intuitively obvious, the inventors have discovered viasimulation studies that the benefit of reduced stray capacitance in theupper left corner more than compensates for the effects of the increasedresistance from smaller overlap area A, thus resulting in reduced RCtcfor the worst case signal paths. Similarly, the inventors havediscovered in the lower right corner, the benefits of reduced resistancefrom increased overlap area A more than compensates for the effects ofincreased stray capacitance. Thus, locally varying overlap areas thatgenerally increase from the upper left corner to the lower right cornerprovide an additional means to reduce worst case RCtc.

While not explicitly shown in FIG. 6 or 7, it is understood that touchsensitive devices may be designed in which both thechannel-width-to-link-width ratio R and the overlap area A are locallyvaried, providing further reduction in worst case RCtc.

The value of the channel-width-to-link-width ratio R and/or overlap areaA may vary smoothly and continuously over the touch area. Alternativelythe touch area may be partitioned into zones where within each zone thechannel and link geometry is fixed. In either case, the local variationof channel and link geometry may be tuned and optimized in such afashion to improve system performance by RCtc reduction.

While various embodiments have been described, it will be apparent tothose of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments andimplementations are possible that are within the scope of the claims.The various dimensions described above are merely exemplary and may beadjusted, for example, based upon the dimensions of the substrate, thenumber pads, the ratio of the number of pads in the different electrodeorientations, the sheet material used for the conductive layers, etc.Accordingly, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artthat many more embodiments and implementations are possible that arewithin the scope of the claims. Therefore, the embodiments described areonly provided to aid in understanding the claims and do not limit thescope of the claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A capacitive touch sensitive device,comprising: a matrix of pads patterned in a first electricallyconductive material on a substrate or multiple substrates, whereinhorizontally adjacent pads in even rows of the matrix are electricallycoupled to one another via channels to form a plurality of horizontallyarranged electrodes; and conductive links formed over respectivechannels configured to electrically couple vertically adjacent padsbetween odd rows of the matrix to form a plurality of verticallyarranged electrodes, wherein dimensions of the channels and theconductive links are optimized locally by varying width ratios betweenwidths of the channels and widths of their respective conductive linksor overlap areas between the channels and their respective conductivelinks.
 2. The capacitive touch sensitive device of claim 1, wherein theoverlap areas between the channels and their respective conductive linksare constant when the width ratios vary.
 3. The capacitive touchsensitive device of claim 1, wherein the width ratios between widths ofthe channels and the widths of their respective conductive links areconstant when the overlap areas vary.
 4. The capacitive touch sensitivedevice of claim 1, wherein the plurality of horizontally arrangedelectrodes are disposed on a first surface of the substrate, and whereinthe plurality of vertically arranged electrodes are disposed on anopposing second surface of a second substrate.
 5. The capacitive touchsensitive device of claim 1, further comprising: one or more insulatorspositioned between the respective channels and their respectiveconductive links.
 6. The capacitive touch sensitive device of claim 1,wherein dimensions of the channels and of the conductive links areconfigured to minimize time needed to sense a capacitance valueassociated with a first electrode of the plurality of horizontallyarranged electrodes having a channel from among the channels and asecond electrode of the plurality of vertically arranged electrodeshaving a conductive link from among the conductive links.
 7. Thecapacitive touch sensitive device of claim 1, wherein aresistor-capacitor time constant of each of the vertically arrangedelectrodes and the horizontally arranged electrodes is less than 6.5 μs.8. The capacitive touch sensitive device of claim 1, wherein aresistor-capacitor time constant (RCtc) of each of the verticallyarranged electrodes is within ±50% of the RCtc of each of thehorizontally arranged electrodes.
 9. The capacitive touch sensitivedevice of claim 1, wherein a ratio of a total number of verticallyarranged electrodes to a total number of horizontally arrangedelectrodes is approximately 16:9.
 10. The capacitive touch sensitivedevice of claim 9, wherein each pad of the matrix is a diamond-shape padand has an area of approximately 18 mm².
 11. The capacitive touchsensitive device of claim 1, wherein the channels are patterned in atransparent conductive material with a sheet resistance of approximately150 Ω/sq.
 12. The capacitive touch sensitive device of claim 1, whereinthe conductive links are formed from a transparent conductive materialthat has a sheet resistance of approximately 200 Ω/sq.
 13. A method ofmanufacturing a capacitive touch sensitive device, comprising:patterning a matrix of pads in a first electrically conductive materialon a substrate or multiple substrates, wherein horizontally adjacentpads in even rows of the matrix are electrically coupled to one anothervia channels to form a plurality of horizontally arranged electrodes;and forming conductive links over respective channels configured toelectrically couple vertically adjacent pads between odd rows of thematrix to form a plurality of vertically arranged electrodes, whereindimensions of the channels and the conductive links are optimizedlocally by varying width ratios between widths of the channels andwidths of their respective conductive links or overlap areas between thechannels and their respective conductive links.
 14. The method of claim13, further comprising: disposing the plurality of horizontally arrangedelectrodes on a first surface of the substrate; and disposing theplurality of vertically arranged electrodes on an opposing secondsurface of a second substrate.
 15. The method of claim 13, wherein thedimensions of the channels and the conductive links are configured tominimize time needed to sense a capacitance value associated with afirst electrode of the plurality of horizontally arranged electrodeshaving a channel from among the channels and a second electrode of theplurality of vertically arranged electrodes having a conductive linkfrom among the conductive links.
 16. A capacitive touch sensitivedevice, comprising: a matrix of pads patterned in a first electricallyconductive material on a substrate or multiple substrates, whereinhorizontally adjacent pads in even rows of the matrix are electricallycoupled to one another via channels to form a plurality of horizontallyarranged electrodes; and conductive links formed over respectivechannels configured to electrically couple vertically adjacent padsbetween odd rows of the matrix to form a plurality of verticallyarranged electrodes, wherein at least one resistor-capacitor timeconstant (RCtc) of the matrix is different from at least one other RCtcof the matrix, and wherein dimensions of the channels and the conductivelinks are optimized locally by varying width ratios between widths ofthe channels and widths of their respective conductive links or overlapareas between the channels and their respective conductive links.